Arvind Subramanian (India’s former Chief Economic Adviser) and Josh Felman (former IMF Resident Representative to India) have brought out a new policy paper, offering a diagnosis of the Indian economy and recommendations for the forthcoming budget. In this post, Ashok Kotwal (I4I Editor-in-Chief) highlights key takeaways from their paper. Over the next few days, I4I will present a series of comments by eminent economists on this analysis.
On 1 February, the Finance Minister will present the annual budget of the central government, and the budget will be extensively analysed in the media by various experts and commentators. This is an extraordinary year and the expectation is that a strong budget can signal that we are on the path to recovery. Budgets typically lay out the government’s plan to deal with the present state of the economy, backed with financial allocations. It is also indicative of broad policy direction and priorities. Any assessment of the budget measures cannot be undertaken without a good understanding of how the economy got to be in the state it is now. It has to be based on what worked and what did not work, and steering clear of past mistakes in the way forward.
Arvind Subramanian, India’s former Chief Economic Adviser, had a ringside view of the various policy initiatives during the period 2014-2018. In fact, several of these initiatives had his thumbprints on them. He has recently written a significant paper (jointly with Josh Felman) presenting his candid views on what worked and what did not work in hindsight. The authors provide their assessment of the appropriateness of the policy measures and their judgement on how much social good particular policies confer on various segments of the Indian population. Subramanian and Felman first offer their diagnosis of the issues, and then make recommendations for the future.
We, at I4I, thought that this would be a timely opportunity for our readers to take a look at the policy initiatives through the eyes of someone who was right there among the policymakers. We have therefore invited a few eminent economists to comment on Subramanian-Felman’s paper. I believe that this symposium will give you the necessary background to better appreciation the budget discussions.
I suggest that you first read the Subramanian-Felman paper (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DpAx6Uj4uboMLfAxsnVW42athbXfZnHD/view). The authors have also written a Mint op-ed (hyperlink) that succinctly summarises the analysis and key takeaways. And below, I give an even shorter version highlighting the salient features of the Subramanian-Felman paper.
The authors point out that the Modi 1.0 regime has some significant achievements to its credit but the implementation of a few of the policies left something to be desired. The culprit for the flawed implementation, according to Subramanian-Felman, was what they call ‘software’ of policy design and implementation. I understand it to mean the government’s approach to creating trust and the art of consensus-building. Some reform measures were pushed through without showing any desire to compromise. The recent protests over the new farm laws is a case in point.
The following table from Subramanian-Felman paper summarises their assessment of various government policy initiatives. The authors believe that most of these policy initiatives were wisely chosen (good ‘hardware’) and yet were only partially successful in the way they functioned due to the fact that the government did not succeed in securing a buy-in from all concerned parties. This, in turn, was due to the lack of political skills in persuasion and public communication with a large number of those who had a stake in the policy initiative at hand (bad software). Further, this was perhaps attributable to the loss of government’s credibility and trust. Questionable government data and the unethical ex-post Vodafone judgment were the kinds of developments that potentially caused an erosion of public trust in the government. The authors’ prescription to correct this software bug are: accurate data, fair decisions, Statecraft to win support for the measures, policy consistency over time, and rule of law in implementation.
I4I will carry a symposium of a diverse group of economists that will comment on Subramanian-Felman’s assessments of the Government of India’s policy choices and the consequences.
Perspectives on the analysis
“New Welfarism”: Old wine, new bottles? - R. Nagaraj (IGIDR)
The Indian economy and policymaking: Towards ‘openness’ - Nirvikar Singh (University of California, Santa Cruz)
An assessment of policy performance under the current regime - Maitreesh Ghatak (London School of Economics)
I4I is now on Telegram. Please click here (@Ideas4India) to subscribe to our channel for quick updates on our content